Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Barack HUSSEIN Obama = censorship!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," Barack Obama told top GOP leaders recently, whom he had invited to the White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package- which by the way, will eventually cost more than EVERY single war America has EVER fought since this country has existed.... but I digress. Shortly afterward Limbaugh retorted, "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to this guy, say 'okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails'."

Fair enough. But that isn't where the story ends. Obama warned Republicans on Capitol Hill that they need to "quit listening" to Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats and his new administration. A-WHAT!?!?

Pardon me. Are they saying what I think they're saying??? No. Gawd, no.... don't let us go down this road.... I am begging you. Please. Not in America.... not here. Not now.

But yes, it is true.... the petition went out of the White House late yesterday afternoon, January 27th, 2009- "The Day Freedom Died"!

But first, let's be clear about one thing right away; the same people that think it's "cool" for the President of the freeking UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to convince The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to launch an online petition against Rush Limbaugh for hoping he "fails" are the same douche bags that thought it was just aces for the Dixie C*nts... uh, er... Chicks to call President Bush a "Dumb f---"!

The Dixie Chick's movie "Shut Up and Sing" shows the singers watching a news report on President Bush's reaction to their infamous on-stage comment, overseas no less. In the report, Bush says "the Dixie Chicks are free to speak their mind," adding, "they shouldn't have their feelings hurt just because some people don't want to buy their records when they speak out. You know, freedom is a two-way street." After watching this footage, Maines then repeats the president's comment and says, "What a dumb f---." She then looks into the camera, as if addressing Bush himself, and reiterates, "You're a dumb f---." Classy ladies, real classy. No, there's no bias or double standard there at all... nooooo. Not at all, sir.

Bush understood that freedom is a "two-way street", why can't Hussein.... oh golly. I am sorry, did I really say that? I got the memo, but I forgot.... I must be temporarily retarded today. That's right, we can't use that name anymore, can we.... well, f*ck it! Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Hussein Obama!!! HUSSEIN! HUSSEIN!! HUSSEIN!!!

This is America, people! Where our very FIRST Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Read it. Learn it. Believe it. And deal with it!

Rush will NOT be silenced. Not now, not ever. And if he is, then EVERYTHING we ever thought about Barack HUSSEIN Obama was all true!!! And then, the rebellion will truly begin! IF Rush is censored, or God forbid, taken off of the air completely; it will amount to nothing shy of a fascist dictator's vendetta to silence all that oppose he and his ilk. And I swear to you ALL-- mark my words-- this time, change WILL come... but not the kind you all hoped and prayed for.

As for what Rush said: RIGHT ON, RUSH! If Socialist policies, Communistic tendencies, down-right blatant Fascism, a new kind of American dictatorship, corporatism and crapping on the Constitution and our 1st Amendment Rights as freedom-loving Americans is what he stands for.... I hope he fails, too!!!!

.... I just hope we don't all have to fail right along with him....
Top Blogs

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Can you spot the REAL racist Party?! Part II

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

The Republican Party was born out of the very people that allowed for Abraham Lincoln to become one of our greatest, if not our very greatest champion of equal rights to people of all color. They started as the “Anti-Slavery Party”, and in the early 1850’s the Republican Party was conceived by anti-slavery activists and individuals who met for the first time in a tiny school house in Ripon, Wisconsin. Their motto was, “For Liberty and against human bondage.”

But that wasn’t all they stood for. The new party put forward a vision of modernizing the entire United States — emphasizing higher education, banking, railroads, industry and cities. In fact, it is little known that The Republican Party founded ALL of the historical black Colleges and Universities in the Nation. A fact, they probably don't teach in those same colleges today.

It was the Republicans who also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon‘s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation‘s first goals and timetables into play. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

And, it was Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. President Eisenhower actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military, and under Executive Order 10730, Eisenhower placed the Arkansas National Guard under Federal control and sent Army troops to escort nine black students into an all-white public school.

And don’t forget, it was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860's, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was actually fair to blacks.

Not to mention, President George W. Bush has appointed a more diverse set of top advisers, including women, blacks, and Hispanics, than any president in the history of America. He even named his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to be the first female African-American secretary of State. But, of course, many on the left today still call him "racist" for his slow call to action during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

In comparison, it was Sen. Ben Tillman, another Democrat, who said in 1906, “Republicanism means Negro equality, while the Democratic Party means that the white man is supreme. That is why we Southerners are all Democrats."

Even the ‘liberal’ New York Times got into the action on May 10, 1900 saying, “. . . The Republican Party committed a great public crime when it gave the right of suffrage to the blacks. . . . So long as the Fifteenth Amendment stands, the menace of the rule of the blacks will impend, and the safeguards against it must be maintained."

But don’t forget it was Franklin Roosevelt, the long time hero and standard bearer of the Democrat Party, who headed up and implemented one of the most horrible racist policies of the 20th Century – the Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
Roosevelt also appointed two notorious segregationists to the United States Supreme Court. Roosevelt appointed South Carolina segregationist Democrat Jimmy Byrnes to the court. Roosevelt later made Byrnes a top advisor, where the segregationist earned the nickname “assistant president.” Byrnes was Roosevelt’s second choice behind Harry Truman for the VP nod in his 1944 reelection bid. Roosevelt also appointed segregationist Democrat Senator Hugo Black of Alabama to the court. Black was a former member of the Ku Klux Klan with a notorious record of racism himself.

And then there was Senator Robert Byrd, who vowed that he would never fight in an integrated armed services noting, "Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds" The same senator Byrd who was a member of the KKK, and who Democratic Sen. Christopher J. Dodd praised only recently.

And then there was Democrat Jesse Jackson who has a history of using anti-Semitic slurs and on a multitude of occasions derogatorily calling New York City “Hymietown.” As well as Al Sharpton, who is a central figure in the Democratic Party today, that fanned the 1991 Crown Heights race riot, where a mob shouting anti-semetic slurs murdered an innocent Jewish man. Sharpton also incited a 1995 protest of a Jewish owned store in Harlem where protesters used several anti-semetic slurs.

And black Chicago politicians are screaming racism today because Democrat Senator Harry Reid was pushing for Gov. Blagojevic to appoint a non-black replacement for President-Elect Barack Obama, in the much-hyped Gov. Blagojevic "how much am I bid for this seat" scandal.

It shouldn’t come as any great surprise now that the Democrats are still embroiled in racist controversy today; and want desperately to make reparations for it by electing Barack Obama. After all, this behavior has followed them from the very beginning.

It was even Barack Obama’s own pastor of over 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who wrote in a church-affiliated magazine (among MANY other things), “In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” Or was that just the Democrats?

And then of course there’s James Cone (Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s hero and mentor and theologian of Black Liberation Theology, which Barack Obama himself up until it was deemed politically inadvisable, was a card carrying member of). He said, “Either God must do what we want him to do, or we must reject him.” He goes on to say, “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”

And to think that millions of Americans refused to vote for the eminently qualified Mitt Romney because his religion is just a little too weird for the rest of us.

But of course, this very long, vile, degenerate, and telling history of the Democrat Party will all be washed away clean on January 20th, 2009 when Barack Obama is elected as our very first black Democratic President. All of the racism, bigotry, profiling, intolerance, prejudice, bias, discrimination, fanaticism, and hate will cease to exist; when they finally take a cue from the Republicans and begin a new era of fairness, tolerance, and open-mindedness.

…. Of course, until Barack Obama's own Vice Presidential pick calls him an, “articulate, bright, clean and a nice looking guy”, again or says something like, “You can’t go into a Dunkin' Donuts or a 7-Eleven unless you have a slight Indian accent." Oops! They did it again….
Top Blogs

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Can you spot the REAL racist Party?! Part I

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

Finally! The Democrats have stepped out of the dark ages of slavery and condemnation of skin color to elect the first black President, and follow suit with what the Republicans have been saying all along! This is particularly historic, not only because today is the day Barack Obama is Inaugurated as our 44th President, but because this is the day after we have paid homage to another great, black, REPUBLICAN leader- Martin Luther King, Jr.

Oh come on, did it really come as any shock to you that MLK was a Republican in an era when nearly every black man and woman was a registered Republican? He was, after all, the man (Democratic) President Lyndon B. Johnson referred to in anger as “that nigger preacher” after Dr. King began protesting the Viet Nam conflict in 1967. Of course LBJ was never quite ‘on board’ with this whole ‘Civil Rights Movement thing’. When he was a then Senator of Texas he said, "These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness.” Ouch! Especially since I don't even think uppityness is an actual word.

Martin Luther King, Jr. is also the same person President John F. Kennedy (again, a Democrat) had his brother (then, Democratic Attorney General) Robert F. Kennedy undermine by wiretapping and investigating with help from the FBI because the good Doctor was suspected of being a Communist. Bobbie even said in 1961 about the plight of the black man, “I did not lie awake at night worrying about the problems of Negroes."

It is interesting to note that most people ignorantly laud President Kennedy as a proponent of Civil Rights, when in fact, he was not. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act while he was a senator, and after he became president, John F. Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King. Not to mention that well into the first two years into his administration, President Kennedy flat out ignored King’s requests for Civil Rights as many historians, including Civil Rights leaders and Dr. King himself would attest to later.

In fact, it was only AFTER television coverage of riots and several very public demonstrations that President Kennedy felt the need to introduce the 1963 Civil Rights Act. And let’s not forget it was a Republican (Ronald Reagan) who saw the value in Dr. King’s efforts as a man of integrity, honesty, conviction, and bravery; and signed into law the very bill that made Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday a national holiday.

But it wasn’t just during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s that the Democrats showed their true ‘colors'. The very simple truth of the matter is that the Democrat Party's sordid history during just this last century is a history wedded with bigotry and hatred stemming largely out of the liberal New Deal era up until our modern day- but it began well before even that!

Let’s hop in the Way-Back Machine, kids, and start at the birth of the Democratic Party at the hands of it’s founder, Andrew Jackson— who was coincidentally enough, a slave owner. Jackson said, “If blacks were given the right to vote, that would place every splay-footed, bandy-shanked, hump-backed, thick-lipped, flat-nosed, woolly-headed, ebon-colored Negro in the country upon an equality with the poor white man." What a way to start a party!

But it didn’t end there.

Every year after that, until the middle part of this last century, the Democrat Party’s own Party Platform consisted of language the likes of, "Instead of restoring the Union, it [the Republican Party] has, so far as in its power, dissolved it, and subjected ten states, in time of profound peace, to military despotism and Negro supremacy”. That was from 1868. And then, in 1948 when the party nominated Strom Thurman they said, "We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race."

One African-American pundit recently said of the Democrat Party, “It is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: Slavery, Secession, Segregation and now Socialism.”

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in the bonds of slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. It was the Democrats who fought to prevent the passage of every single civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860's, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950's and 1960's. It was the Democrats who have had Klan members serve in elected capacity within the high ranks or the Party. And it was even the Democrats who started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks.

Of all the days in U.S. history, July 4th, 1924; the Democrat Party held their convention labeled the “Klanbake Convention.” While outside the convention on a field in New Jersey, one of the largest Klan gatherings was held in unison and in commemoration of the event itself. The convention was marked by speakers spewing racial hatred, celebrations of their platform victory in the Democrat Convention, and even ended in a cross burning.

As for Civil Rights; Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Act was substantial enough to literally split the party in two. A whopping 40% of the House Democrats voted AGAINST the Civil Rights Act, while 80% of Republicans SUPPORTED it. Republican support in the Senate was even higher. Similar trends occurred with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was supported by 82% of House Republicans and 94% of Senate Republicans.

In fact, a calculation of 26 major civil rights votes from 1933 through the 1960's civil rights era shows that Republicans favored civil rights in approximately 96% of the votes, whereas the Democrats opposed them in 80% of the votes! These facts are often intentionally overlooked by left wing Democrats for obvious reasons, especially on this day of all days.

In 1865, the 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it.

When Southern states were angered at the implementation of the 14th Amendment, Congress came back and passed the 15th Amendment in 1870, guaranteeing blacks the right to vote. Every single Republican voted for it; every Democrat voted against it.

And it was none other than the very first Republican President in the history of this great Nation to win the White House who made it all a reality for a black man to be President of the United States of America. On November 6, 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the 16th President of the United States of America. And it was Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, who issued the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War by saying, “In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free,” while nearly every single Democrat at the time stood in defiance.

Stay tuned in 2 days for Part II!
Top Blogs

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Mccain and the animals!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

Gun-totin’, animal-killin’, war-mongering, woman-hating, minority-loathing, old, white, Christian men! That’s what the Republican party is all about, right? If that’s what you think; darlin’, you got a long way to go before you get it right!

Democrats at Republican Conventions, washed-up film stars as politicians (wait, that’s been seen before), and now take Mr. Reach-across-the-aisle- Republican Presidential nominee- Senator John McCain, as an example of "not what you'd expect from a Republican presidential candidate". He is a strong supporter of animal welfare issues; in fact, out of all of the potential Republican candidates we saw this last election, he's the only one who took a strong stand in support of animals.

Not only did he cosponsor a bill to stop horse slaughter, but he also supported another one to stop the shipment of live birds between states for the sole purpose of buyers using them for cockfighting. But that’s not all. He loves that silly old bear named Pooh! He backed a bill that aimed to put an end to people killing bears who sell or trade their organs. Now, that’s my kinda’ man-cub, baby!

And Harrod’s beware; the Mac-Attack also took a major stand against the fur industry, voting to eliminate a $2 million subsidiary they had been receiving. But wait! There’s more. He ALSO voted against allowing oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, saving the thousands of animals who lived there.

Come on, there’s no denying it- John McCain is an animal lover. With fourteen dogs, six cats, two turtles, three birds, fourteen fish, a ferret, and the proverbial partridge in a pear tree, he far surpasses the average number of pets per household. So, there you have it.

Animal lover. Grumpy old man. War hero. Patriot. John McCain.

Of course, I’m not saying the ol’ Big Mac is perfect by any stretch; because he’s not— he lost to Captain Distribute-My-Wealth himself, Barack Obama, after all! And some animal crazies like me would be horrified because Mac did vote in support of an amendment to the California Desert Protection Act that would allow hunting for sport in Mojave National Park, and he is a supporter of hunting in general.

But though I am not a hunter myself, I recognize there are still far more self proclaimed hunters in the United States than vegetarians like me, so I don’t plan to get my rutabaga in a bunch over it. It’s those small steps that matter in the long run, after all.
Top Blogs

Friday, January 16, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Why I voted Republican this year!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

I was asked recently why it was that I had become a Republican after years of Liberal-leaning tendencies.... the short answer is: because I have grown up. If you are not at least somewhat idealistic when you are young, you are a person with no dreams or hope for tomorrow’s future, and you will likely never change it into a better place at all. But if you don't evolve into a more conservative person as you grow older, you simply lack the drive and ability to become the hard-working, determined person you need to be in order to affect those changes at the end of the day.... but the long answer is a bit more complex....

As a matter of my nature, I have always been much more conservative personally, and much more liberal politically. In essence, what is good for you may not be best for me, but I will respect it regardless.... I will "liberally" accept what you choose, but I will not necessarily accept it for myself or my family. I don't drink, I don't smoke, I have never done a drug in my life- maybe not in the sense of being "Republican", but that makes for a somewhat more conservative lifestyle than most, and I do my best not to contradict my own sense of morality in that. Take the issue of Pro-Life, for instance. Unlike most so-called "Pro-Lifers", I am truly Pro-Life.

After all, Pro-Life is a somewhat loaded term, isn't it? Just because you are for the life of an unborn fetus doesn't make you Pro-Life. I am however against the death penalty, against abortion, a vegetarian,an animal welfare advocate, against the atrocities of war while, all the while, still very much pro-American troops. I AM Pro-Life all the way across the board as much as I can be and not be too much of a hypocrite.

Basically, I vote my conscience.

I heard a politician once say, "If you agree with me on 7 out of 10 issues, vote for me. If you agree with my opponent 7 out of 10 issues, vote for him. If you agree with either one of us on 10 out of 10 issues admit yourself to a psych ward!" There is no way to agree with any politician that often and not paint yourself into a corner you can never get out of no matter how hard you try. Besides, if you do, all you will ever be is a talking head or mouthpiece for one side or the other.

So, that's where I am today.

I don't agree with the Left on every issue, and I don't agree with the Right on every one.... they both have their merits, and they both have their failings. Which isn't to say I am fickle or a flip-flopper; I am just simply practical. There are some politicians who embody more of "me" than others depending on the circumstances of their candidacy and the issues of the day. And isn't that why we vote in the manner we all do in the first place- to find a politician who most closely resembles our ideals and politics TODAY?

Thus, I chose to vote for a Republican presidential candidate for the first time in my life this last year. And I likely will continue to do so for the most part from now on.

But why here- why now? The bottom line is: I am no different than any other person who votes Republican. Democrats have the sometimes uncanny habit of over-pontificating every issue no matter how great or how small it seems. People vote Republican because Republicans offer "moral clarity"— a simple vision of good and evil that activates deep seated notions such as patriotism, freedom, liberty, honor, and so much more. When we are younger, we often see the world though shades of grey, or morally ambiguous at best— (mostly to explain away our brash and sometimes unwelcome social behaviors we eventually "grow out of"). The older we get, often the more comfortable, secure, and devout in our morality we become. That’s why here- that’s why now. That’s why I grew up.

After all, even at the end of Peter Pan, Wendy understood the merits of growing old and wise away from the fantasies of Never, Neverland.

But, make no mistake, life IS built on shades of grey, and comfort sometimes equals rigidness. It is a fine line we walk every day of our lives. And one we need to walk so we understand the complexities around us.

But, while that's the long and the short of it..... I still support the best possible person for the job, regardless of race, religion, gender, war hero or not, party line, or affiliation. And I will vote with that same moral compass and wisdom for the future.… Democrat, Republican, or other…. The best person for the job will always be my personal pick to be the leader of the greatest Nation in the free world!

That's me in a nutshell.

Top Blogs

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Why we vote!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

Abraham Lincoln once cautioned, “Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves, and, under a just God cannot retain it." And though voting, as some may argue, may not be afforded the mantel of a right as perceived in our own Constitution, it most certainly is our freedom as Americans; if not our obligation, responsibility, and duty. It is in fact one of several allowances that accompany American citizenship— the freedom and responsibility of voting. Voting is one of those important privileges we as Americans cherish. Although you may not be able to force a person to vote during any election season, it is their freedom to be afforded the opportunity all the same…. This freedom of all Americans.

Did you realize in 1797 that John Adams succeeded George Washington without a single shot fired, or the title inherited through family ties, or one ounce of blood shed? This was the first time in the history of the entire world where such an act occurred, and it was indeed the birth of our modern day world view of Democracy. It was the dawn of one of the greatest tenants any nation can be granted, and it was exclusively ours for a time. We dare not let that freedom die. We dare not let liberty down.

For, if you choose not to vote, you allow others the luxury of taking from you one of your fundamental expressions as freedom-loving Americans. And then, that single act of Democracy-in-action over two hundred years ago would have all been in vain.
And please, don’t for one second think your vote does not count. It does; in theory, in action, with liberty and justice for all— your vote counts. After all, as Ralph Waldow Emerson said, “Those who stay away from the election think that one vote will do no good: 'Tis but one step more to think one vote will do no harm.”

Republican, Democrat, Independent, or other: Vote your conscience in every election, and let freedom ring! Let freedom ring loud and strong, and let her never cease to shine as brightly as she does this day and forever.

Top Blogs

Monday, January 12, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: WHO'S paying the most in taxes?!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

A new poll came out that claims 44% of Americans think that the rich (people that gross more that $250,000) should pay more in taxes.... as if that is rich by society's standards today anyway. But, keep in mind, the "rich" already pay more than 25% in taxes currently of what they earn; not to mention home owners taxes, and insurance taxes, and taxes on food, and gasoline, and their cars, and energy, and propane, and the water we drink; and State and Local, and Federal taxes! Meaning, if El Presidente, The Count Barackula, has his way- he’ll bleed us all dry! Not just the "rich".

Alright, so believe it or not, THAT isn't the part that pisses me off to no end! 44% of Americans think this Robin Hood mentality is just tops…. but now for the rub.... wait for it.... waaait…. for…. it!....

40% of Americans don't even PAY taxes!!!! So, sure those deadbeat, lazy, inept, worthless- dare I say UN-AMERICAN asses, want the hard working and backbone of our country to pay more in taxes while they are on welfare, and cashing in food stamps, and getting stimulus checks from Uncle Sam. (Can you believe that; these people get a freaking stimulus check, too!?) I want to quit my job, lay around the house, live off the government, make babies out of wedlock, have cigarette stained fingers, smell like dirty feet and liquor, and not have a care in the world. Where do I sign up?

Oh, but that isn't all. These people played a big part in how the voting turned out this last November. But, why are they even given that right? In my oh so humble opinion (excluding seniors and stay-at-home mothers or fathers) healthy, viable people who don't pay taxes or work for a living, should not be allowed to vote since they don't contribute one iota to our country's society in the first place. But instead, Barack Obama and ACORN and others rounded these people up like cattle to TAKE them to the polls to GIVE them the most precious of privileges this country has to offer.... (not to mention, register some of them more than once.)

I can't take it anymore!!!!

Remember that old saying, '"First thing we do is eat the rich"? Well, if I had my way, I'd substitute the word "rich" for whatever these people want to be called today, and pig out! At least then, their existence may have some meaning and value. And keeping in mind-- this: from a vegetarian! However, in this case.... toss me a freekin’ leg! I’m hungry!
Top Blogs

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: Michelle Obama wants my pie!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

I know it may seem like old news to everyone out there, but it still bares repeating…. Over and over and over again!

I thought Ms. Anti-America, Michelle Obama, said it all when she claimed she wasn't really proud of this country until her husband ran for office, but now she has taken the cake.... and she wants my pie! “The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”

Alright, I've officially had it with El Presidente, his ilk, and anyone officially stupid enough to EVER support them, and I absolutely refuse to take it for one more second! Now, she claims that in order for our government to give to one person, they must take from another. That the so-called "poor" be even more coddled and catered to by working folks like you and I, who have earned every penny we have today no thanks to government programs and subsidies that do no good but to enable people toward laziness and ineptness and down-right ignorance. As if our welfare system, and uber high taxes weren't bad enough- now they want me to give even more of what I have earned; all for what?! People that don't have the fortitude to manage their own finances and take care of themselves? Government mandated distribution of wealth is not the answer, people.

And a revamped education system, Michelle? We have increased federal spending on education by 58% since 2000 (after inflation), and no one in their right mind would argue that education has improved 5.8%, let alone 58%. In fact, American families will pay $4,000 more per household in taxes this year than in 2003, the highest level since the last year of the Clinton administration. We have already given more of the "pie" for government expansion over the years.

Education spending is at an all time high, Medicare and Social Security are on the verge of bankruptcy, the economy is in the tank, and the bail outs…. Well, just don’t even get me even started with those! But still, Michelle Obama’s idea of “new leadership” is an increased tax burden on the ever hard working middle class to institute yet another government program which will be destined to fail- and fail miserably!

The answer is not giving my piece of the "pie" away, Michelle, the answer lies in teaching others to bake their own god-damed pies for themselves!!!
Top Blogs

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse: The Sun is really, REALLY hot!

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter." George Washington

Welcome to the Slaughterhouse, America!!

By Nicholas Meyeres

Long ago in a far off land, kings and queens were mostly advised by wizards, star-gazers, flim-flam men and frauds. It is generally believed that these old school Harry Potters would feed on the leaders’ own fears and closed-minded views of the way the world was presented to them- and to that end, these people would prey on entire societies by using the false superstitious beliefs of all involved.

Of course, with the advent of science, these snake oil salesmen all went the way of the Dodo, right? Oh ye’ of little brain power: in the words of that creepy little girl from Poltergeist— “They’re heeeeeeeeeeerrreeeee.” Or more accurately, “They're back!” This time, though, they are no longer cloaked in the dark veil of mysticism and magics, but by the very essence of science itself.

A vocal minority of the scientific community, with the help of unqualified outsiders (Al Gore anyone!), has persuaded many politicians to pursue plans that would be economically devastating to the entire world. And the fear mongering this time centers not on a flat world or falling stars, but rather, around global warming and the end of days.

But are they all lies this time around? Of course not. The best lies contain at least some measure of truth in them. Yes, carbon dioxide in the air has increased in the last century due to the use of fossil fuels. Yes, the global average temperature has increased 0.8 degrees F in the same century. Unfortunately, the temperature increase came first: most of the temperature increase was before 1940, and most of the new carbon dioxide was added after 1960. Would you trust a "scientist" who said the result came before the cause? I think not.

And then, there’s this little bit of oddness: Jupiter is growing a new red spot.

Little is known about how storms form on the giant planet. They are often described as behaving similar to hurricanes right here on Earth. The latest images could provide evidence that Jupiter is in the midst of a global change that can modify temperatures by as much as 10 degrees Fahrenheit on different parts of its globe. But how is that if there are no cars, or people on Jupiter? Isn’t global warming man-made???

After all, most scientists now fear that the massive amount of carbon dioxide humans are pumping into the air will lead to a catastrophic rise in Earth's temperatures, dramatically raising sea levels as glaciers melt and leading to extreme weather worldwide. So then, how do you explain Jupiter? Or Mars for that matter?

Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural— and not a human-induced—cause, according to many scientists' theories. But Mars seems to be melting more rapidly than ever before. So, are the Martians and their not-so-eco-friendly rockets ships to blame on the Red Planet?

Many scientists believe that changes in the sun's heat output can account for almost all the climate changes we see on all three planets. Gee. Go figure that. The sun may be mostly to blame for heating things up in our ENTIRE solar system…. The really, really HOT sun.

So, to all you cheats, fakes, fast-shuffle artists, imposters, phonies, pretenders, quacks, shams, and fear-mongers: This isn’t the dark ages anymore, and we’re smarter than you give us credit for… well, most of us are… ok, so not all of us…. alright, Conservatives mainly. Anyway, my point is, do your own research and don’t just take my word for it. After all, I may be wrong… though, not very likely.
Top Blogs